Cases 31 - 40 of 64
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vigue v. Davis et al
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Vigue
Defendant:
Keith Davis, R. Langford, Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc., John Harler, Dayna Vango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Bonneau v. BOP, et al
as 14-35761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN BONNEAU
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. E. THOMAS, ROGER HAWKS and others
Ronald Hood #235278 v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD KING HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Warden, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, RICHARD STAPLETON, Hearings Administrator and others
Richard Bryan v. Terrie Matsen, et al
as 14-35493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD WESLEY BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRIE MATSEN, SCCC Mailroom Staff, CHERYL SULLIVAN, SCCC Mailroom Sergeant, KERRI S. MCTARSNEY, SCCC Grievance Coordinator and others
Huff v. Leislier et al
as 3:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Huff, Sr.
Defendant:
Stacey Leislier, Unknown #1, P. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prevost v. Garcia et al
as 4:2013cv02423
Plaintiff:
Mark Prevost
Defendant:
Adrian Garcia, R Jenkins, Name Unknown 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv05578
Plaintiff:
Giovanti Carr
Defendant:
Diamond Arnold, Officer Unknown #1, Officer Unknown #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASHADDAI v. ANDREWS et al
as 4:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
NYDEED NASHADDAI
Defendant:
DIANA ANDREWS, EDWARD D WATSON, JS MCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
