Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Hartzog v. Lamour et al
as 2:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Alton V. Hartzog
Defendant:
Jacques Lamour, William Price, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckhart v. Lamour et al
as 2:2015cv00486
Petitioner:
Daniel Gerald Eckhart
Respondent:
Jacques Lamour, William Price, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and NANCY GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Price, et al
as 12-1276
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDY KAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM PRICE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Kailey v. Price
as 1:2011cv03418
Petitioner:
Randy Kailey
Respondent:
William Price and The Attorney General of the State of: Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Price v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 10-4396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMERON, ATTY GEN PA and DA FAYETTE
William Price v. Kenneth Cameron, et al
as 10-3805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMERON, Superintendent and M DELOZIER, OFFICER
William Price v. Orchid Cellmark Inc, et al
as 09-4218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
ORCHID CELLMARK INC, jointly and severally and in their official capacity, MARGARET A. TERRILL, Orchid Cellmark Laboratories, jointly and severally and in her official capacity, CHARLOTTE J. WORD, Orchid Cellmark Laboratories, jointly and severally and in her official capacity and others
PRICE v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2009cv00218
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRICE
Defendant:
KENNETH R. CAMERON and OFFICER M. DELOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
