Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 13,808
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00492
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00945
Plaintiff: Anthony Thompson
Defendant: Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff: Jose Vazquez
Defendant: Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 3:2024cv00315
Petitioner: Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent: Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert E Martin v. Brandon Price We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv01118
Petitioner: Robert Edwin Martin
Respondent: Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant: GEO Group Inc, D. C. Cole, Christine Topping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarty v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2024cv01378
Plaintiff: Roger McCarty
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources, Phillip Martin, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Moore et al
as 3:2024cv00923
Plaintiff: Daris Best
Defendant: Moore, Martin, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Magill et al
as 4:2024cv01946
Plaintiff: Jonathan Brandon-Keith Henry
Defendant: A.D.A Matthew Magill, A.D.A. Jane Doe #1, A.D.A John Doe / Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Jonassen, et al v. Bop, et al
as 24-1918
Plaintiff: MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant: BOP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MR. PERKINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?