Cases 41 - 50 of 358
Cantu v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00517
Petitioner:
Cesar Eutemio Cantu
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) McClintock v. Valencia et al
as 2:2022cv01884
Plaintiff:
John Scott McClintock
Defendant:
G. Valencia, L. Cantu, J Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gosztyla v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2022cv01706
Plaintiff:
Richard Gosztyla
Defendant:
A. Jenkins, T. Coker, N. Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu v. OPenume et al
as 6:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
George M. Cantu, Jr.
Defendant:
Uknown OPenume, Dale Wainwright, B.A. Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu v. Kempt et al
as 6:2022cv00202
Defendant:
Unknown Hoffner, P. Kempt, Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
George M. Cantu, Jr.
Consolidated Defendant:
Uknown OPenume, Dale Wainwright, Lonnie LaFayet Liannet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu Alvarado v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Donald Javier Cantu Alvarado
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01047
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rivers v. Cantu
as 2:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Denzel Samonta Rivers
Defendant:
Sgt Danika Cantu and Wisconsin Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantu v. Brazoria County
as 3:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Roman Angel Cantu
Defendant:
Brazoria County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Neal, et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Defendant:
Daquiri Moss, Jeff Neal, Warden Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
