Cases 41 - 50 of 1,228
Adams v. Kitchens et al
as 4:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Adams
Defendant:
John Kitchens and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Gordy et al
as 7:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Terry Perkins
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy and John Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Retic v. Captain John Hutton et al
as 5:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Anthony Retic
Defendant:
Captain John Hutton and Lieutenant Michael J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southard v. Hogg et al
as 2:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Kenny Southard
Defendant:
John Hogg, Jo Woods, Ebony Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Fair et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Officer Fair and John Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Cunningham and Dewayne Scott Cunningham
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Lt. Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Burch
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Ms. Jackson, Sam Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
John Riley Donald
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Parole and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burnett v. Marion County Jail (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
John Paul Burnett
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
