Cases 41 - 50 of 341
HUNTER v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2019cv03463
Defendant:
CLARENCE THOMAS, U.S. SENATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATURE and SEVEN JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
DARRYL M. MCGUIRE
Respondent:
J.L JAMISON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv03173
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASEY v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv02539
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H.U.C.U. et al v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv01964
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, JOHN C SANDERS, JONATHAN HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
M.G.B.V., H.U.C.U. and G.M.C.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAMBERS v. HOROWITZ et al
as 1:2019cv01895
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. BILER and MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ
Plaintiff:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01852
Plaintiff:
BRIAN M. CASEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv01810
Defendant:
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv01636
Defendant:
STRAIGHT, SAMANTHA L. ZAREK, RONALD MCDAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAVAS v. STATE OF NEVADA et al
as 1:2019cv01323
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA and JEROME M. POLAHA
Plaintiff:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
