Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Jason Ferguson v. Bill Gate
as 15-1380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GATES
Ferguson v. Gates
as 3:2014cv02103
Plaintiff:
Jason Ferguson
Defendant:
Bill Gates
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. Nett et al
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Alverson v. Microsoft Corporaton, et al
as 11-12103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY ALVERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BILL GATES, SCOTT STEIN and others
Alverson v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00526
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Bill Gates, State of Alabama, The and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02696
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Bill Gates, Scott Stein and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Christopher Klamczynski v. J. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv04992
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Fred Goodman, Fred Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Klamczynski
Finley v. Biden et al
as 1:2010cv00165
Defendant:
"Mr." Fletcher, Vice-President Joseph Biden, John Cornyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Mellah Pace v. Cal Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00842
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mellah Pace
Defendant:
Cal Department of Corrections, Elvin Martinez, Elvin Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
