Cases 41 - 50 of 605
Marshall v. Bright
as 1:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Vincent Marshall
Defendant:
Willie Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Griffis et al
as 7:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Michael George Valdez
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Griffis, Chief Deputy Eddie Mancha, MSGT Taelor Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Bright et al
as 6:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kevin Briggs
Defendant:
Carolynn Bright and Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Bright et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Richard Roe and Kevin Briggs
Defendant:
Carolynn Bright and Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartley v. Bright et al
as 5:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Roger Andrew Hartley
Defendant:
D.O. D. Bright, M.D. Joseph Bick, K. Kumar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Melton v. Bright et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Rex Melton
Defendant:
Samantha Bright, William Mustage and Andrea M Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Peasley v. M. Spearman, et al
as 23-15177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT PEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, D. BRIGHT, Chief Medical Officer, ZAHED AHMED, Doctor and others
Ramos v. Koltiwenzew et al
as 1:2022cv07301
Plaintiff:
Feliberto Flores Ramos
Defendant:
Chad Koltiwenzew, Todd, Corporal Bartucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Management Training Corporation, et al
as 22-4032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, DEPUTY WARDEN JAMES CRAIG, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, ANITA EDMONSTONE, Case Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
