Cases 41 - 50 of 159
Hendrix v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2020cv00059
Defendant:
William Gittere, Erin Howard, Danial Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers-Bey v. Webster et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Tamaro Crouch, Michael Paniaugua, Dr. Unknown McCollum and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Flowers-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Calderon v. Magdy et al
as 1:2019cv01734
Defendant:
Lawrence Gamboa, Nancy Siegrist, M. Mays and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michalek v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv06169
Respondent:
Jefferson County Courthouse, Port Townsend Police Department, Patrick Fudally and others
Petitioner:
Brian Judah Michalek and Brian Watson Michalek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Killens v. Sheffield et al
as 3:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Sgt. Danials, Sheriff Lynn Sheffield, Cpt. Sid Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Killens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newby v. Howell et al
as 3:2019cv01064
Defendant:
Danial Sullivan, Jerry Howell and Michael Proctor
Plaintiff:
Thomas Newby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uaisele v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2019cv02176
Respondent:
Danial H. May, Laurel Chase, Robert L. Lowery and others
Petitioner:
John Vaisele and John Uaisele
Defendant:
Phillip Weiser and Barry Goodrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricker v. Salas et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
LVN/PT Ramirez, Sergeant Keenan, Correctional Officer Aviles and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ricker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mitchell v. Hopper et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Plaintiff:
Correy Mitchell
Defendant:
Luna, L.T. G. Hopper, S. Leal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Escamilla v. Danial
as 3:2018cv02500
Plaintiff:
David Escamilla
Defendant:
A. Danial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
