Cases 41 - 50 of 727
Drake v. Zimmerman et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Drake
Defendant:
Chief Andy Zimmerman, Officer Chandler, Officer James Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake Jr. v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2023cv14160
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Drake Jr. doing business as Our Family Ministry EIN#: 46-6983436
Defendant:
State of Florida and Keeefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Drake Jr. v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2023cv14161
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Drake Jr. doing business as Our Family Minitry EIN#: 46-6983436
Defendant:
State of Florida, Great America Financial Service Corp. and Pinellas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Duclos v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, J. Gregory, T. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Lynch et al
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, J. Gregory, T. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake Pettersen v. USA
as 5:2023cv00851
Petitioner:
Drake Ryan Pettersen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Drake v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Drake, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettersen v. USA
as 3:2023cv00590
Petitioner:
Drake Pettersen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
PERKINS v. DRAKE et al
as 3:2023cv06444
Plaintiff:
SEAN KRIS PERKINS
Defendant:
CLIFTON A DRAKE, KARI GARRETT and MO ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Stewart et al
as 2:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Kyler Dakota Shaw
Defendant:
Heidi Stewart, Jeremy Nofziger, B. Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
