Cases 41 - 50 of 597
Staton v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02217
Petitioner:
Jonathan Edward Staton
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SANDERS v. TOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv01027
Plaintiff:
LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS
Defendant:
KELLY TOMPSON, AVERY MICHELLE CRUMP and EDWARD BRUSCNO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McRavion v. Bullard et al
as 5:2022ct03426
Plaintiff:
Joshua Glenn McRavion
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Amanda Edwards, Clayton Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurek v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02165
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Kurek
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
LEVAN SANDERS
Defendant:
ASST. D.A. KELLY THOMPSON and EDWARD BRUNSCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOREHEAD v. USA
as 1:2022cv00930
Petitioner:
GARLAND EDWARD MOREHEAD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Martinez Reyes v. Edwards et al
as 5:2022ct03369
Plaintiff:
Manuel Efrain Martinez Reyes
Defendant:
Lieutenant Edwards and Sargent Blunks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. USA
as 1:2022cv00826
Petitioner:
RODNEY EDWARD WALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lyons v. Bullard
as 5:2022hc02159
Petitioner:
Carl Edward Lyons
Respondent:
Superintendent Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannady v. Polk County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Lamar Cannady
Defendant:
Polk County Jail, Rutherford County SBI, Polk County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
