Cases 41 - 50 of 1,502
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01457
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 23-40657
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Fidencio Garza
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Whitehead v. Medical Staff et al
as 5:2023ct03315
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Whitehead
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Sheriff Hans Miller, Lt. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Garza
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Warden, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Goodman, Jr. v. Mark Williams, et al
as 23-3039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE P. GOODMAN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK WILLIAMS, Warden, KURT OSMUNDSON, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Williams v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Williams
Defendant:
John Doe Schwartz, Lieutenant R. Keen, Lieutenant John Doe Frisk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Joshua Anderson v. Fernando Garza
as 23-3846
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA GARY ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FERNANDO GARZA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
