Cases 41 - 50 of 768
Hammond v. Hooper
as 79-4029
Petitioner:
Forrest Hammond
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Bell v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bell
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Andrew Mitchell
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Hooper
as 24-30066
Petitioner:
Ellis Reed
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Louisiana State Penitentiary
Hodge v. Zimmerman
as 24-10066
Plaintiff:
Theotis Lee Hodge
Defendant:
Dustin Zimmerman, Correctional Officer V, Sergeant, James Judd, Captain, James Villegas, Major and others
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Sumpter v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2024cv14008
Plaintiff:
Antuashia Nytiqua Sumpter and Anteshia Sumpter
Defendant:
State of Florida, Jeanette Lugo and Stephen Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean vs. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00095
Defendant:
Joshua P Dean and Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
