Cases 41 - 50 of 269
Duncan v. Menlove et al
as 2:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
James David Duncan
Defendant:
James Menlove, J Adam Shepherd and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Valerie Stewart
Defendant:
Gila, County of, J Adam Shepherd, Unknown Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. County of Will, et al
as 1:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
George L. Hooper
Defendant:
County Of Will, Michael Kelly, Dale Santerelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Merritt
Defendant:
Gila, County of and J Adam Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dwayne Turner
Defendant:
Gila, County of and J Adam Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Henderson v. J. Adams, et al
as 22-10880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ADAMS, ENGLISH, SGT., DEAN, MR. and others
ADAMS v. Wahl et al
as 3:2022cv00495
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY J. ADAMS
Respondent:
Mr. Wahl, District Attorney of Bradford County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barajos v. Gila, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Barajos
Defendant:
Gila, County of and J Adam Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morel v. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lenin Morel
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00555
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
