Cases 41 - 50 of 58
JOHNSON et al v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2012cv06598
Plaintiff:
SALIYM JOHNSON, MIKE COVINGTON, CHRISTOPHER MYERS and others
Defendant:
YOUNG, RICHARDSON, C. PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodeur v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05545
Respondent:
Steven Banks, City of New York, ADA Anne Guttman and others
Petitioner:
Christopher X. Brodeur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Nooth
as 2:2012cv01417
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Luis J. Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Augustus, et al.
as 1:2012cv00925
Plaintiff:
C. Dwayne Gilmore
Defendant:
D. Augustus, J. S. Diaz, C. Lockard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Cervantes v. Darrel Adams, et al
as 12-16196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE H. CERVANTES
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREL G. ADAMS, Warden, CSP, SUSAN HUBBART, Director of Sacramento, J. GARZA, Lt. IGI, KVSP and others
Atcherley v. Clark et al
as 1:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Atcherley
Defendant:
Edgar Clark, Glenn Thiel, Teresa Macias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. Adams et al
as 1:2011cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Cervantes
Defendant:
Darrel G. Adams, Susan Hubbart, J. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGlothin v. Harrington et al
as 1:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michael John McGlothin
Defendant:
K. Harrington, J. Torres, M. Capello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Adam Torres-Ojeda
as 09-4057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ADAM J. TORRES-OJEDA
TORRES-OJEDA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv03545
Plaintiff:
ADAM J. TORRES-OJEDA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
