Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Spencer v. Bentley et al
as 7:2012cv01832
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Christopher Murphy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littleton v. Keenum et al
as 3:2011cv03818
Plaintiff:
James Edward Littleton
Defendant:
Jackie Keenum, Mary Simpson and Howard Simpson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00361
Petitioner:
James Edward Wallace
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Kenneth Jones and Steve Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. Carter et al
as 1:2010cv01026
Petitioner:
James Edward Bagley
Respondent:
Carter and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bagley v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2010cv00961
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama and Samuel Monk, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01089
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, Cynthia Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell et al v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01076
Plaintiff:
Darrius Bryant Bell and James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, Cynthia Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Holt (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00844
Plaintiff:
James Edward Moore
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. Circuit Court of Calhoun 2003-0815 et al
as 1:2009cv01288
Petitioner:
James Edward Bagley
Respondent:
Circuit Court of Calhoun 2003-0815, Cheryl Price and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
