Cases 41 - 50 of 31,031
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does French Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. DOE et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WATSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodley v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Kaloni Goodley
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
as 7:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franco v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Franco
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
as 7:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thevenin v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80682
Plaintiff:
Loveus Thevenin
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
