Cases 41 - 50 of 517
Kidwell #212405 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alec Kidwell
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Freeland, Unknown Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. KEEFE COMMISSARY
as 2:2022cv02443
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Richard Mendoza v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC
Shawn Goff v. Trinity Services Group, et al
as 22-15564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC, THOMPSON, Warden and others
Baker #46157 v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
John P Baker
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network and Access Securepak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodrick v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Bree Derrick, Ross Castleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Keefe Commissary et al
as 5:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Collins
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary and Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester #262478 v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 2:2021cv00706
Defendant:
William R Thomas, Amber Puckett, Trinity Services Group and others
Plaintiff:
Matt Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook #207197 v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 2:2021cv00703
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Yarrow Cook
Defendant:
William R Thomas, Amber Puckett, Trinity Services Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benavidez #190420 v. Trinity Services Group et al
as 2:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Steven A Benavidez
Defendant:
William R Thomas, Amber Puckett, Trinity Services Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
