Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Clark v. Kellogg et al
as 5:2009cv06127
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel Kellogg and Pamela Kay Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Blevins et al
as 5:2009cv06103
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Pamela Kay Blevins, Dwight K. Scroggins, Jr. and Sadie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Trebas et al v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar et al
as 2:2009cv03561
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trebas, Charles Garrigues, Leonard Griffith and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce McPherson, Kimberly S Belshe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN et al v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE GRIFFIN, BILLY JOE STEVENSON, JOSHUA R STALVEY and others
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trebas et al v. Schwarzeneggar et al
as 2:2009cv01259
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trebas, Charles Garrigues, Leonard Griffith and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bruce McPherson, Kimberly S Belshe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 3:2007cv00887
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Louis Lee Clark, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark III v. Barton et al
as 2:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Clark III
Defendant:
Tim Barton, Glynn County Police Department, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIEST v. NETTLES et al
as 3:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
THEODORE JAMES PRIEST
Defendant:
JONATHAN E NETTLES, MA-LEE CLARK, Forehand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Williams
as 1:2007cv00103
Petitioner:
Benny Lee Clark
Respondent:
Rose Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
