Cases 41 - 50 of 2,315
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bueno v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2023cv07055
Plaintiff:
Nivaldo Bueno
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30752
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30749
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and State of Louisiana
Hebert v. Hooper
as 23-30736
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Hebert
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dixon v. Hooper
as 23-30715
Petitioner / Appellant:
Roy R. Dixon
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Lay v. Hooper
as 23-30782
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
