Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Conery/Malik v. Jackson et al
as 2:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Marcus Conery/Malik
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, III, Lathan Ester, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Jackson
as 2:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Corey Perkins
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Beebe et al
as 2:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Parker
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Ray Hobbs, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00350
Plaintiff:
Byron L Conway
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Burl et al
as 1:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Antione Carter
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Greg Harmon, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Mills v. Greg Harmon, et al
as 10-2976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jon Mills
Defendant - Appellee:
Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Steven R. Outlaw, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, D. Todd Ball, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Obama v. Burl et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Hassan Obama
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Ray Hobbs, Moses Jackson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
William Christopher Moore
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Jackson et al
as 5:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
Byron L Conway
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, III, Frank O Scott, Jr, P Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Mills v. Greg Harmon, et al
as 10-2557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jon Mills
Defendant - Appellee:
Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Steven R. Outlaw, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, D. Todd Ball, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
