Cases 41 - 50 of 388
Morrison v. Evans et al
as 5:2022ct03407
Plaintiff:
Randolph Morrison
Defendant:
Dr. Charlotte Ann Evans, Nurse Rhonna Medlin, Kendell Mullens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps v. Mullen et al
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Marvin W. Millsaps
Defendant:
Jason Todd Mullen, C. E. James, A. Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Savas et al
as 2:2022cv03580
Plaintiff:
Khalil Duante Washington
Defendant:
Nina Savas, John Mullen, Roger Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
White v. 1/2nd Pct. Nassau County HQ15 et al
as 2:2022cv04970
Plaintiff:
Mr. Julius White
Defendant:
1/2nd Pct. Nassau County HQ15, Police Officer Sean Mullen, Police Officer Jason Ury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Everett et al
as 5:2022ct03255
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
D. Everett, Captain Turley, C/O Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. Salamon et al
as 3:2022cv00953
Petitioner:
Christopher Mullen
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullen v. Easton
as 3:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Noah Mullen
Defendant:
Trevor Easton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Mullens et al
as 7:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
C/O C. Mullens, Unit Manager Larry Collins, Sgt. B. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. Easton
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Noah Mullen
Defendant:
Trevor Easton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullen v. Butler et al
as 5:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
Audrey Mullen
Defendant:
Lt Butler, Lt J Sharkey, Lt Kenneth Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
