Cases 41 - 50 of 134
O'Connor v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Royal, Pippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cave v. Carter et al
as 3:2016cv00410
Plaintiff:
Cletis Cave
Defendant:
Carter, C. Stevenson, O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Village of Oak Park et al
as 1:2016cv06084
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
The Village of Oak Park, James Sperandino, A Episcopo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv22028
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Royal, Pippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv80818
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. O'Connor
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wanke v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2016cv50101
Plaintiff:
Richard Wanke
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, County of Winnebago, Illinois, IL Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smolen, Jr. v. Wesley et al
as 1:2016cv02417
Plaintiff:
Samuel J Smolen, Jr.
Defendant:
C.O. M. Wesley, C.O. W. Stevens, C.O. C. Lampon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brevard County Jail et al
as 6:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail and Judge O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Lammi et al
as 0:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton, Kaine Braun, Michael D Perseke and others
Defendant:
Nick Lammi , Chad Mesojedec , Richard O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. Andrews et al
as 3:2015cv01539
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Defendant:
Diane Andrews, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Lester Quinones-Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
