Cases 41 - 50 of 55
HALL v. COOL, et al
as 3:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICARDO ALEXANDER HALL
Defendant:
OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and GARY COOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv00616
Defendant:
Michael L. Abston, J. Aldrick, Tamara L. Baxter and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00797
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jones v. Oconee County Jail et al
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dexter Jones
Defendant:
Oconee County Jail, Scott Berry, Chuck Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Oconee County Detention Center et al
as 3:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrance Ward
Defendant:
Oconee County Detention Center, Scott Berry, Chuck Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Tinsley II v. James Singleton
as 10-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. TINSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES SINGLETON, Sheriff, Oconee County, GREG REED, Detective Oconee County, DAVID SMITH, Detective Oconee County and others
Freeman v. Berry
as 3:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Alvin W Freeman
Defendant:
Scott Berry, Oconee County Jail, Chuck Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Pruitt et al
as 8:2010cv00970
Plaintiff:
Morris Wayne Gunn
Defendant:
Steve Pruitt, David Wald, Robert Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00201
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Fluker v. J. Owens
as 09-7932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL COREY FLUKER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. D. OWENS, of the South Carolina Highway Patrol
Defendant - None:
LESLIE SIMMONS, OCONEE COUNTY SOLICITORS OFFICE and EDWARD DELANE ROSEMOND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
