Cases 41 - 50 of 202
Cano v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv01074
Defendant:
Chaplain Herber, Chaplain John Doe, Warden Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor James Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. McGorsie et al
as 1:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Leonta Jackson, Timothy McGorsie, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kennedy
as 1:2020cv01392
Defendant:
City of Pontiac, Illinois, Teri Kennedy and Illinois America Water Company
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horta v. Pontiac Correctional Center
as 1:2020cv01257
Defendant:
Pontiac Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Jose J Horta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stocker v. Pontiac Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv01194
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden and Pontiac Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balle v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01213
Defendant:
Susie Hobart, Unknown Pontiac Correctional Center Maintenance Supervisor, . Harbarger and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Balle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant:
Pontiac Correctional Center Medical Director, John Baldwin, James Engush and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv01165
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PONTIAC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF OFFICERS, UNKNOWN PONTIAC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF SUPERVISORS, UNKNOWN PONTIAC CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MEDICAL SUPERVISORS and others
Plaintiff:
Lateef Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Kennedy
as 1:2019cv02124
Respondent:
Director Department of Corrections, Terri Kennedy, Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois and others
Petitioner:
Demetrius H Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyce v. Madigan et al
as 1:2019cv01074
Defendant:
Kimberly Foxx, F/N/U Tyes, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
