Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Schmitt v. Corsini
as 1:2011cv10359
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Defendant:
Michael Corsini, Robert Murphy, Duane McEchern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHIMMINGER v. CAMDEN COUNTY PAROLE OFFICE et al
as 1:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH P. SCHIMMINGER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY PAROLE OFFICE, ROBERT MURPHY, MALLOY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crotty v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 4:2010cv40245
Plaintiff:
Richard Crotty
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Mark A. Conrad, Candace Kochin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmitt v. Seward, et al
as 10-2356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SCHMITT
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLIN SEWARD, ROBERT MURPHY, Superintendent, BERNARD BRADY and others
Feijoo v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv11951
Plaintiff:
Humberto Feijoo
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Khalid N. Khan, Robert Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mederos v. Murphy, et al
as 10-2222
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO MEDEROS
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT MURPHY, Superintendent of Bridgewater State Hospital, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Battista v. Clarke, et al
as 10-1965
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SANDY J. BATTISTA
Defendant - Appellant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and MICHAEL CORSINI
Defendant:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, ROBERT MURPHY, STEVE FAIRLY and others
Interested Party:
MHM SERVICES, INC.
Robert Murphy v. John Higgin
as 10-2819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. HIGGIN
Hill v. Griffin et al
as 6:2010cv06419
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Patrick Griffin, William Hopkins, Angela Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maske v. Murphy, et al
as 10-1180
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY L. MASKE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT MURPHY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
