Cases 41 - 50 of 303
ASBERRY v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, WARDEN JIMMY MYLES, WARDEN SHARON OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Williams
as 22-3196
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES T. WILLIAMS, also known as MAX also known as MATH
Williams v. Mort et al
as 1:2022cv05363
Plaintiff:
Terrence T. Williams
Defendant:
Joseph Mort, Jeffrey Dudek, Janette Shiperak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States
as 1:2022cv08199
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Marsala v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-16260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH AUGUST MARSALA
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR until late 2020, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR until late 2020, PATRICK EATON, Warden and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
Williams v. Stuart et al
as 6:2022cv06336
Plaintiff:
Marquis Williams
Defendant:
C.O. J. Stuart, C.O. J. Brayette, C.O. J. Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Williams v. United States
as 1:2022cv04564
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
