Cases 51 - 60 of 118
Jackson v. Brand et al
as 1:2018cv01385
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, John Doe, Public Relations Personnel and others
Plaintiff:
Vernell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Routt v. Hansford et al
as 4:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Dustin Hansford and Joshua Lankford
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Routt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stallworth #702124 v. Williams-Overstreet et al
as 1:2018cv00541
Plaintiff:
Victor Derek Stallworth #702124
Defendant:
L. Williams-Overstreet, Aramark Corporation, J. Wilbur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carzoglio v. Abrams et al
as 1:2018cv04198
Plaintiff:
Angelo A. Carzoglio
Defendant:
Thomas Abrams, Karl Vollmer, Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv04086
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lewis
Defendant:
Westchester County, Global Tel-Link, Aramark Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dykes v. Aramark Corporation
as 4:2018cv01414
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Dykes
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02246
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, County of Westchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv01975
Plaintiff:
Damon Haynes
Defendant:
Westchester County, Westchester County Department of Corrections, Design Specialties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00025
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Sandi Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
David Ray Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
