Cases 51 - 60 of 120
Leniart v. Strom et al
as 3:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
George M. Leniart
Defendant:
Steven R. Strom, Robert Dearington, William Bundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bochner v. Martin County et al
as 2:2017cv14422
Plaintiff:
Neal H. Bochner
Defendant:
Martin County, Martin County Sheriff Office, William D. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROINS v. WHEELER et al
as 3:2017cv11632
Plaintiff:
MARTIN GROINS
Defendant:
SCO B. WHEELER and LT. JOSEPH BUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
David Wilson v. Robert Fox, et al
as 17-17091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. FOX, Warden, BRIAN DUFFY, Ex-Warden, D. HURLEY, Associate Warden and others
BUNDY v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2017cv03308
Petitioner:
ERIC BUNDY
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Sean Bundy
as 17-6885
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN RONDELL BUNDY, a/k/a Bun Rock, a/k/a Humps
Bundy v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv01551
Respondent:
Nadia Ahmed, Erin Creegan, Doyle Decker and others
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leniart v. Bundy
as 17-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George M. Leniart
Defendant - Appellee:
William Bundy, Sergeant, Wilfred J. Blanchette, III, Michael Hoagland, Detective and others
Bundy v. United States of America inc et al
as 2:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Bundy
Defendant:
Charlotte Collins, Corecivic and United States of America inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
