Cases 51 - 60 of 192
Coll v. Worcester House of Corrections
as 1:2019cv12592
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Coll
Defendant:
Worcester House of Corrections, John Doe, Michael Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2019cv11982
Plaintiff:
Derek Thomas
Defendant:
Scott Murray, Corey Pointer, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Turco et al
as 1:2019cv11807
Defendant:
Mark Fogeran, Karen Collins, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Da'Shawn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. Thompkins et al
as 1:2019cv11349
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Naphcare Medical Department, Jane Doe # 7 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botelho v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2019cv11039
Plaintiff:
Michael Botelho
Defendant:
Barnstable House of Correction, Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Bethany Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carcino v. Streeter et al
as 3:2019cv30031
Respondent:
John Doe, Kristjen Nielson, William P. Barr and others
Petitioner:
Stefano Andre Carcino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Sheriff Department Plymouth et al
as 1:2019cv10256
Defendant:
John Does and Sheriff Department Plymouth
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv10082
Defendant:
Jane Does, Francis D. Pien, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Jospeh Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Hersey et al
as 1:2019cv10046
Defendant:
Karen D. Beausey, Deborah Scalfani, Ann Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Oniel Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. McKesson Medical Surgical Inc et al
as 1:2018cv12516
Defendant:
Dr Strous, Factory in China, McKesson Medical Surgical Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
