Cases 51 - 60 of 2,333
Johnson v. Johnson, et al
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON, MOSES STANCIL, PLANNEL and others
Holbrook v. Hurlbert et al
as 7:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dwayne Holbrook
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, Charles Hurlbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Oaks et al
as 4:2023cv10119
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra, Talika Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Johnson, Moses Stancil, Plannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeSean Baskin v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia, et al
as 23-14045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESEAN M. BASKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF, FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA, NAPHCARE, INC., HAYES-ARMSTRONG and others
DeSean Baskin v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia, et al
as 23-14043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESEAN M. BASKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK LABOTT, HAYES-ARMSTRONG, SAINT-SIREN and others
Campbell v. Lochrie et al
as 5:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Trimard C. Campbell
Defendant:
FNU Lochrie, Deputy FNU Reid, FNU Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv05551
Plaintiff:
Tommy A. Moore
Defendant:
JJ Hayes, Judge A. Taylor, Sherry Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
