Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Stewart v. Millyard et al
as 1:2009cv01166
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Stewart
Respondent:
Kevin Millyard and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Wallace v. Moberg, et al
as 09-55115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
MOBERG, Correctional Officer, ESCAJEDA, Correctional Officer, KING, Judge, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Stewart v. King County Jail, et al
as 08-35306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
KING COUNTY JAIL, KING COUNTY, REED HOLTGEERTS, Jail Director and others
Stewart v. King County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
John M Stewart
Defendant:
King County Jail, King County, Reed Holtgeerts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Stewart et al
as 4:2007cv03796
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Corey Shelton
Defendant:
Robert M Stewart and Mary C Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stewart v. Koppel et al
as 1:2007cv02866
Petitioner:
Byron M. Stewart
Respondent:
Robert A. Koppel and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Jones et al
as 1:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Walter M. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Carlos Jones, Michelle Phillips, Lori Byron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. USA
as 1:2007cv00095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter M. Stewart, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stewart v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00578
Petitioner:
Byron M. Stewart
Respondent:
James Smith and Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
