Cases 51 - 60 of 292
SALHAB v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01446
Petitioner:
AMJAD SALHAB
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv01127
Petitioner:
SPENCER TURNER
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOVE v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
TONY LIONEL LOVE
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JOSEPH, SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
JASON REED
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH, GEO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONDS v. HENDRIX et al
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BONDS
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, JENNIFER FARMER, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC) et al
as 1:2022cv00601
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALAN SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), GEO GROUP INC, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROCKETT v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv00556
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CROCKETT
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
MARQ HALL
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATTON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
