Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Rickett v. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy
as 1:2011cv08324
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Rickett
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Information Policy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv02996
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Davidson
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and Office of Information Policy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seme v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Joseph Seme
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Justice Department and Office of Information Policy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seme v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 8:2011cv02486
Plaintiff:
Joseph Seme
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Justice Department and Office of Information Policy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2011cv02072
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Information Policy and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMANUEL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2011cv01514
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EMANUEL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Maurice Cooper v. William Stewart, II, et al
as 11-5061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice D. Cooper
Defendant - Appellee:
William G. Stewart, II, EOUSA/FOIA/DC, Dione J. Steaine, EOUSA/FOIA/DC, Janice Galli McLeod, Office of Information Policy and others
VENKATARAM v. OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY et al
as 1:2009cv06520
Plaintiff:
NATARAJAN VENKATARAM
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY and JANICE GALLI MCLEOD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
