Cases 51 - 60 of 60
Brown v. Owens et al
as 5:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Renard Brown
Defendant:
Owens, Woods, Mcelroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Speights v. Barry Goodrich, et al
as 10-14829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK L. SPEIGHTS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY GOODRICH, Coffee Correctional Facility, Individually and in His Official Capacity, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORNELL CORRECTIONS HEADQUARTERS and others
Jones v. D. Ray James Detention Center
as 5:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Emanual Jones
Defendant:
D. Ray James Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. D Ray James Detention Center
as 5:2010cv00042
Plaintiff:
Terry N Campbell
Defendant:
D Ray James Detention Center and City of Folkston, GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. D Ray James Detention Center
as 5:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Terry N Campbell
Defendant:
D Ray James Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ray James v. Tim Reich, et al
as 10-1300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Ray James
Defendant - Appellee:
Tim Reich, Secretary of Corrections and Doug Weber, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
Clay v. Owens et al
as 5:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
Dontae Clay
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Donald Jackson, Joel Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Reich et al
as 4:2008cv04007
Plaintiff:
James Ray James
Defendant:
Tim Reich and Doug Weber
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sims v. Harris et al
as 5:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Sims
Defendant:
L. Harris, Department of Corrections and D. Ray James Prison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McAllister v. Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00407
Plaintiff:
Ray James McAllister
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons, T C Outlaw and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
