Cases 51 - 60 of 4,652
Israel v. Tomlison et al
as 3:2024cv03718
Defendant:
S. Tomlison, Correctional Officer Soto, Charles Schuyler and others
Plaintiff:
Akiva Israel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv07069
Petitioner:
WILFREDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MATT PLATKIN and BRUCE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenzie v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00266
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Demorris Sanchez McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sanchez v. Banner Lassen Medical Center
as 2:2024cv01681
Defendant:
Banner Lassen Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez, Jr, Fernando v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv22258
Plaintiff:
Fernando Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Sanchez-Galvan et al
as 3:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Benny Ford
Defendant:
K. Saunders, E. Sanchez-Galvan, O. Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez Sanchez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00287
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Parker et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Samson Solomon, Ryan Mathis, Jesus Arreola and others
Defendant:
Summit Foods, FNU Lucero, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Sanchez, et al
as 24-1245
Plaintiff:
LOUIS M. CORDOVA
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SANCHEZ, D.P.D. Officer #P19-062, JOHN/JANE DOE, JOHN/JANE DOE, JOHN/JANE DOE
(PC) Sanchez v. Wollet et al
as 1:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Mary Ann Wollet, Tulare County Sheriff Dept and Wellpath Provider
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
