Cases 51 - 60 of 164
Harry v. The Alaska Parole Board et al
as 3:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Harry
Defendant:
The Alaska Parole Board, The Alaska Court System, The Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Stansberry v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2021cv00182
Petitioner:
Leroy J. Stansberry
Respondent:
State of Alaska, Court Judge OPA, Mike Dunleavy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tholson v. Hises et al
as 3:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Girl Scouts of the USA and Leon Tholson
Defendant:
Farthest North Girl Scout Council, Timothy Hises, Chris Lyou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Beebe v. State of Alaska et al
as 1:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, State of Alaska, Chastity Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Charles Beebe and Jeremy Beebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stern v. Anchorage Municipality et al
as 3:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Joachim Stern
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Walmart Stores, Anchorage Police Department and others
Redfox v. State of Alaska
as 3:2021cv00095
Petitioner:
Wyatt N. Redfox
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Cordle
as 1:2021cv00007
Respondent:
State of Alaska and Bob Cordle
Petitioner:
Randell Gene Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reclaim Lee Roy J Stansberry et al v. Refiled Deputy Attorney General Merrick Garlan et al
as 3:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Natasha, Sherman Jones, Attorney Darryl Hansens and others
Defendant:
State of Alaska Gov Mike, Refiled Deputy Attorney General Merrick Garlan, Fleur L Roberts and others
Wilkerson v. Cordle
as 3:2021cv00070
Petitioner:
Vincent Edward Wilkerson
Respondent:
Attorney General for State of Alaska and Bob Cordle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hull v. Hull et al
as 3:2021cv00045
Respondent:
Jennifer S Henderson, State of Alaska and Chandra Hull
Petitioner:
Thomas Hull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
