Cases 51 - 60 of 376
Metcalf-Small v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv03416
Petitioner:
Dayon Metcalf-Small and Neter Au Nuk-El
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Gordon P. Galleghar and Vince Niski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Blind v. Niski
as 1:2021cv02246
Plaintiff:
Keonte Jorel Blind
Defendant:
Vince Niski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Vincent W Boyd and Vince Boyd
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility and Philip Sonnebenge
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Niski et al
as 1:2021cv02106
Plaintiff:
Alonzo T. Smith
Defendant:
Vince Niski, Gilbert and Bill Elder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graves v. Moulds et al
as 2:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wilson Earl Graves, III
Defendant:
Jamie Moulds, Jeff Monk, Vince Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villarreal v. Niski et al
as 1:2021cv02074
Plaintiff:
Pedro M. Villarreal
Defendant:
Vince Niski and T. Carey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acton et al v. Adel et al
as 2:2021cv01226
Plaintiff:
Keisha Action, Nathan Aderholdt, Britney Austin and others
Defendant:
Allister Adel, Tom Van Dorne, Ken Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03804
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. White et al
as 4:2021cv02928
Defendant:
Judge Richard Seeborg, Judge Joseph C. Spero, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Lee Billie v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2021cv03305
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Billie
Defendant:
Cecchetto, County of Santa Barbara, Bill Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
