Cases 51 - 60 of 91
Ferguson v. Lefton et al
as 2:2019cv00255
Petitioner:
John Weston Ferguson
Respondent:
State of Washington, Howard Gefton and Howard E Lefton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Malone et al v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2019cv05574
Plaintiff:
Calvin Malone, Richard Jackson, George O Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, David Flynn and Robert W Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lough v. Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2019cv05543
Plaintiff:
Robert Lough
Defendant:
Robert Ferguson, Department of Social and Health Services and Special Commitment Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2019cv05108
Defendant:
Samuel Carson, John Sackman, Craig Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Edward Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Jacques
as 3:2019cv05017
Petitioner:
Eric Quinn Franklin
Respondent:
Warden I. Jacques, Robert W. Ferguson and I Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trevino v. Washington State et al
as 2:2018cv00376
Defendant:
Washington State, Greg Sypolt, J J Zappone and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Bowe et al
as 2:2018cv00333
Respondent:
Robert Ferguson, United States of America and Jeri Bowe
Petitioner:
Jason Giles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demos v. DOC Classification & Custody Chief (John Doe) et al
as 2:2018cv01151
Defendant:
Chairman of the State of Washington Indeterminate Sentence Reivew Board, Robert Ferguson, DOC Director of Prison Operations and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winterer v. Ferguson
as 1:2018cv03116
Respondent:
Robert Ferguson
Petitioner:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winterer v. Ferguson
as 1:2018cv03147
Respondent:
Robert Ferguson
Petitioner:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
