Cases 51 - 60 of 78
LIN v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv04953
Petitioner:
JI WEN LIN
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. CITY OF HAMILTON et al
as 3:2010cv03989
Plaintiff:
SONNY JACKSON, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF HAMILTON, MICHAEL J. EVERETT, DETECTIVE CAPASSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Deepwater Horizon Rig
as 10-1307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, AKA Bernard L. Madoff, AKA Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab
Defendant - Appellee:
DEEPWATER HORIZON RIG, AKA Transocean Ltd., DBA BP PLC
HENDY v. NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv03574
Plaintiff:
MARVIN HENDY
Defendant:
NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, COREY BOOKER, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00309
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SCOTT v. GALINSKI et al
as 2:2009cv02694
Plaintiff:
RANDY SCOTT
Defendant:
EDMUND GALINSKI, JOHN PASSASELLA, ELMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINSLEY v. BALICIKI et al
as 1:2009cv01905
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
KAREN BALICIKI, LINDA EVERETT, DOUGLAS WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Smart, Jr. v. Scott Peterson, et al
as 08-3905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Lee Smart, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott C. Peterson, Melanie Blake, Daniel Krack and others
GREEN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2008cv04844
Plaintiff:
ANDRE GREEN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, M.C.A.C.C., GUS SANCHEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chetanand Sewraz v. Nhon Nguyen
as 08-6981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NHON H. NGUYEN, RAHMAN & SCHETTINE, PLC, SCHETTINE & NGUYEN, PLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
