Cases 61 - 70 of 1,204
Rios v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Gregory Rushin, Dan Corvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albright (ID 99790) v. Harbin et al
as 5:2023cv03242
Plaintiff:
Shannon Albright
Defendant:
Tanner Harbin, Josh Garver, Elijah Ledesma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. 1 JOHN DOE OFFICER et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Plaintiff:
ALI A. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
1 JOHN DOE OFFICER, OFFICER TANNER and FALLS TOWNSHIP P.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. PATTERSON et al
as 4:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON, CASEY T BARREN, BRITTNEY BAXTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harden v. Tanner
as 2:2023cv12743
Petitioner:
Jermaine Jehvon Harden and Jermain Jehvon Harden
Respondent:
Jeffrey Tanner and Jeff Tanner
Kenneth Konias, Jr. v. David Druskin, et al
as 23-2864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH J. KONIAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DRUSKIN, PA-C, KRISTINA TANNER, MICHAEL J. HERBIK, Doctor and others
Johnson v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Asst. Warden Placido Samaniego, Jr., Asst. Warden Candace Flannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar McKay v. Jeff Tanner
as 23-1928
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAMAR MCKAY
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF TANNER, Warden
Andrews v. York et al
as 3:2023cv02294
Plaintiff:
William Andrews
Defendant:
Charlie York, Robert Johnson and Elmer Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
