Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 31,113
Jimenez v. Jane/John Doe We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv04281
Petitioner: Pedro Jimenez
Respondent: Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JACKSON v. SIPPLE et al
as 2:2024cv02336
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant: DEP. MANDY SIPPLE, UM. FANRAK, LT. CUNNINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff: Zackery Tyler Jackson
Defendant: John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff: Hannibal Eason
Defendant: Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockley v. Sweet et al
as 4:2024cv11462
Plaintiff: Clifton D. Shockley
Defendant: Sweet, Clemmons, Schirmer and others
Jacobs v. David et al
as 5:2024cv11463
Plaintiff: William Edwin Jacobs
Defendant: David, Frangedakis, Branch and others
FLORES v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2024cv06674
Plaintiff: JASON FLORES
Defendant: HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, BECKY SCOTT and OFC. JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff: LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant: SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv01005
Plaintiff: Jamyron Sanders
Defendant: Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff: SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant: ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?