Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Moss v. Livingston et al
as 2:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Leslie Lloyd Moss
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, John Adams, David Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Adams et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Murphy
Defendant:
John Adams, Larry E Berger, Tosha James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gibson, Jr. v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 12-10536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES RAY GIBSON, JR., also known as Chas Ray Gibson, also known as Jay Aaron Whitehead
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN COLLIER, Deputy Executive Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice- Institutional Division, EDDIE WILLIAMS, Senior Warden, JOHN ADAMS, Senior Warden and others
Gibson v. Collier et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Gibson, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Eddie Williams, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph LeBlanc v. John Adams, et al
as 12-10374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH MARK LEBLANC
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ADAMS, Senior Warden, JAMIE BAKER, Assistant Warden, PAUL SLOAN, Assistant Warden and others
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John Adams, Geneta Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Nickerson v. Jeffrey Brown, et al
as 12-10097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON, also known as Cedric Webb
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BROWN, Correctional Officer, SEAN MCFARLAND, Sergeant, JOHN ADAMS, Warden and others
Lane v. Adams et al
as 4:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Karlo L. Lane
Defendant:
John Adams and Robert Greeseree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Adams et al
as 5:2011cv05562
Plaintiff:
Robert John Stockton, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrel John Adams, R. Subia and D Bradbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Thaler et al
as 2:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
William Boyd Pierce
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Bruce Zeller, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
