Cases 61 - 70 of 841
Demos v. Fricke et al
as 3:2023cv05156
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Theresa L Fricke, Erin L Lennon, Tana Linn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. United States District Court
as 3:2023cv05157
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. State Supreme Court of Washington
as 23-35134
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
Arnette v. Ruby et al
as 7:2023cv00714
Plaintiff:
John Robert Arnette
Defendant:
Scott D Ruby and Scott Coffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Demos v Jackson
as 2:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v Jackson
as 4:2023cv05020
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. Jeffrey Immett, et al
as 23-35084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY IMMETT, CEO General Electric Company, DOUG MCMILLON, CEO Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and JOHN WATSON, CEO Chevron Corporation
Horner v. Bantlett et al
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
John Robert Horner
Defendant:
FNU Bantlett, FNU Buckle and Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
