Cases 61 - 70 of 322
USA v. Johnson
as 22-40305
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Devante Lee Johnson, also known as Bonty
Johnson v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Frankie L Johnson, Jr and Frankie Lee Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Jr, Martz and Regal
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2022cv00883
Petitioner:
JUSTIN LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
KYLE RUSSELL, DAVID J. MUSSELL, KERRY TURTZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tommy Johnson, Jr. v. P. Hoffman, et al
as 22-1413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
P. Hoffman, Kevin Schneider, Polk County Sherriff, Dale Peterson and others
Johnson v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00433
Petitioner:
Jody Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Susan Reynolds, Kevin Schneider, County Comissioner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Schnieder
as 4:2021cv00297
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr, Scorpio Alexander Dantzler, Kelsey Ross and others
Respondent:
Kevin Schnieder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson Jr. v. State of Florida
as 6:2021cv01563
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Johnson Jr.
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. State of Florida
as 6:2021cv01556
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson et al v. Schnieder
as 4:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Johnson, Jr, Curtis Tharp, Jonathan McAtee and others
Defendant:
Kevin Schnieder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
