Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 175
Jones v. USA
as 4:2018cv00215
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. FERGUSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00963
Petitioner: ANDRE MICHAEL JONES
Respondent: TAMMY L. FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01937
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: The City of New York, Joseph A. Ponte, Jessy Liburd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Michael v. Syed et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00907
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: Syed , Mashak, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Fulton v. Michael Jones, et al
as 17-2474
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH FULTON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL JONES, Chief and J. SIMS, Det Srgt. #102
Jones v. City of Rogers, Arkansas
as 5:2017cv05111
Plaintiff: Dustin Michael Jones
Defendant: City of Rogers, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Fulton v. Michael Jones, et al
as 17-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH FULTON
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL JONES, Chief and J. SIMS, Det Srgt. #102
Fulton v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv03634
Plaintiff: Kenneth Fulton
Defendant: Michael Jones and J. Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03101
Plaintiff: Michael Jones
Defendant: City of New York, NYC Department of Correction and Warden of Facility A.M.K.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones v. Ava Jourbert
as 17-6492
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee: DR. AVA JOURBERT, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED and JANETTE CLARK, NP
Defendant: RN DAWN HAWK, KRISTY CORTEZ, JAMES HUNT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?