Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Howard v. Memnon et al
as 3:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwon Howard
Defendant:
Jacquez Memnon, James Johns, Joseph Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Memnon et al
as 3:2009cv01249
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwon Howard
Defendant:
Jacquez Memnon, James Johns, Joseph Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Davis
as 4:2009cv02823
Plaintiff:
Destry E Thomas
Defendant:
Mr. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv04941
Plaintiff:
Cordell English
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Mr. Davis, Cook County Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Carlisle et al
as 5:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jackson
Defendant:
Harold Carlisle, John Cary Bittick, Officer Haskin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Matthews, et al
as 6:2009cv01335
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
Mr. Matthews, Mr. Davis and Mr. Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins v. Cross et al
as 1:2009cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael Hollins
Defendant:
James N Cross, C. Mihlo, C. Pulice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shackelford v. GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Dormie Shackelford
Defendant:
GEO Group-Florida Atlantic Shores Corporation, Timothy James Budz, George E. Emanolidis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKever v. Fraiser et al
as 5:2008cv00314
Plaintiff:
Keith McKever
Defendant:
David Fraiser and Mr. Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Coleman v. Dr. Furman
as 08-7594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. FURMAN, MD, Physician, NURSE CUSHION BERRY, Lt. Nurse, NURSE GAINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
