Cases 61 - 70 of 2,399
Armajo v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2023cv00111
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden, State of Wyoming, Seth Norris and others
Petitioner:
Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Allen v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Matteson, Y. Hill, M. Dernoncourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Dulgov
as 4:2023cv00281
Petitioner:
Webster Wayne Norris, III
Respondent:
A H Dulgov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norris v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
Donald E Norris
Defendant:
Keith Franklin, Williamson County Sheriff and Williamson County Court House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tyquil C. Norris, III
Defendant:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Keedy v. l/n/u et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Keedy
Defendant:
Mary l/n/u, Shawn Vanwinkle, Sharron Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREAMER v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
SEAN LEE CREAMER
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03080
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Jerlen Allen, Norris, Selmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
