Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Stanfield v. Gusman
as 2:2009cv07183
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stanfield, Jr
Defendant:
Marlin Gusman and Marlin Gusman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumerlin v. Bloomington Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv01329
Plaintiff:
Ramon Terrell Sumerlin
Defendant:
Bloomington Police Department, City of Bloomington, Michael Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Donald Stanfield, Jr. v. F. Gonzale
as 09-56074
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD L. STANFIELD, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
F. GONZALES, Warden (A)
Stanfield v. Johnson
as 7:2009cv00240
Petitioner:
Anthony Duane Stanfield
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanfield v. Yang et al
as 1:2009cv00980
Plaintiff:
James Edward Stanfield, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Yang, M. Bagwell, J. Leone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanfield v. Johnson
as 1:2009cv00612
Petitioner:
Anthony Duane Stanfield
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Key v. Superintendent Hathaway
as 3:2008cv00470
Petitioner:
Stanfield Key
Respondent:
Superintendent Hathaway
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marvin Sampson v. Law and Justice Center of Bloo, et al
as 08-3516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN K. SAMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW AND JUSTICE CENTER OF BLOOMINGTON MCLEAN COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BRICE STANFIELD, Detective, ROBERT FREITAG, Judge and others
Sampson v. Law and Justice Center of Bloomington McLean County IL et al
as 1:2008cv01196
Plaintiff:
Marvin Sampson
Defendant:
Law and Justice Center of Bloomington McLean County IL, Brice Stanfield, . Shumaker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stanfield v. Callaway et al
as 1:2007cv01786
Plaintiff:
James Edward Stanfield, Sr.
Defendant:
Steven Callaway, Woolfolk, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
