Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Riches v. De Beers Group SA et al
as 6:2008cv01321
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
De Beers Group SA and Anglo American PLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC et al
as 6:2008cv01289
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BOYD v. MCQUIRE et al
as 2:2008cv01530
Petitioner:
LAMONT BOYD
Defendant:
LEO P. MCQUIRE, PARTICIA O'SULLIVAN, PATRICIA BAKAY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALKER v. RICCI et al
as 2:2008cv01378
Petitioner:
JAMES WALKER
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and ANN MILLGRAM
Defendant:
plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. Cadbury Schweppes PLC et al
as 1:2008cv00608
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Cadbury Schweppes PLC and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. VodaPhone Group PLC et al
as 1:2008cv00615
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
VodaPhone Group PLC and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. WPP Group PLC et al
as 1:2008cv00618
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
WPP Group PLC and Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLCIK v. MAYWOOD POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2008cv00890
Plaintiff:
KENNY BOLCIK
Defendant:
MAYWOOD POLICE DEPT., plc, ROCHELLE PARK POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sewraz v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Chetanand Kumar Sewraz
Defendant:
Nhon H. Nguyen, Rahman & Schettine, PLC., Schettine & Nguyen, PLC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Christie's Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Christie's Inc. and Christie's International PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
